tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-495553397518653924.post3658918445164605810..comments2024-01-19T11:41:09.359+13:00Comments on A Hebridean in New Zealand: Another EarthquakeGBhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10289400344300258872noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-495553397518653924.post-1699087329169323622009-03-22T21:00:00.000+13:002009-03-22T21:00:00.000+13:00Yes. It's based upon seismic wave phenomena. It...Yes. It's based upon seismic wave phenomena. It's quite odd because here the first question is always "Where was it?" The second is "What was it on the Richter scale?" The third is "How deep was it?" What one really does not want is a nearby 7.5 at 2k deep. That would seriously rattle your dags.GBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10289400344300258872noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-495553397518653924.post-9398053722477604912009-03-22T20:05:00.000+13:002009-03-22T20:05:00.000+13:00Is the focal depth the estimated depth below the s...Is the focal depth the estimated depth below the surface that the movement was centred upon? I've never seen the phrase before and never thought about how deep down the actual movement was.Scriptor Senexhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17795521284516432520noreply@blogger.com